Quinoa vs Meat

Across the Internet, the debate is raging.  Which is more ethical, eating meat or quinoa?  I posted about this a few days ago, and I’m pleased to see a different point of view has appeared on the Guardian website today.  I was a little brief in my last post about some of the underlying issues, so I thought I would take the time to expand on them a bit here in plain English.

I’m really happy more people are getting interested in this!

Commodity Crops and Subsidies

The basic problem is the majority of the world’s food depends on commodity crops, like corn and soy.  In the US more corn is used, and in Europe more soy.  Corn and soy are not normally environmentally unfriendly to grow, but the same companies which sell the seeds also sell the chemicals, so there is more profit is growing it in energy intensive and environmentally unfriendly ways.  Views in the world have also changed in the last 100 years or so, and we now look down upon the idea of producing food with manual labor.  We expect all of our food will be produced with a minimum of labor, and with as much heavy equipment as possible.  This heavy equipment also causes a lot of damage to the topsoil, severely inhibits it’s ability to sequester carbon and releases significant amounts of greenhouse gases.  It’s not cheap to grow food with all this heavy equipment, chemicals and fossil fuels, so governments step into subsidize the costs, in the end making it far cheaper than all other kinds of foods, anywhere.  These foods then get exported around the world, where they compete unfairly against other small farmers.

The commodity crops are then used to produce ‘processed foods’.  Processed foods are nearly everything you buy at the supermarket or eat at a restaurant, with the exception of fruits and vegetables.  In a sense even fruits and vegetables can be processed, because these are often grown with lots of chemicals and fossil fuels too.  Meat and dairy rank among the most processed foods, because far more raw ingredients are used in their production than other foods, with meat representing the highest level of consumption.

Unprocessed foods are generally those bought at the farmers market, from a local farmer.  You can even buy environmentally friendly meats this way, pasture raised, instead of on commodity crops.  The problem is this sort of meat is very hard to come by, and in very high demand.  A single cow needs about 5 acres or 2 ha of land to meet all it’s needs, and when it’s 4 years old, will perhaps only provide 500-1000 meals.  That’s only one person for a year, who eats meat twice per day!  Even if we used all available space in the world, we still couldn’t meet current demand with pasture fed meat.

When you consider all aspects of processed food production, and all sources of greenhouse gases, it means processed food production is the single greatest contributor to climate change — more than all the worlds transportation systems combined!  This includes the release of carbon from the soil, the fossil fuels that go into the chemicals and fertilizers used, the transportation involved, the processing, flatulence of the animals, retail and so on.

In addition, minerals are and ground water are mined unsustainably in order to make all of this work.

One way or another, something needs to change.  We need to eat less meat, or we need some new technologies for meat production.

Trapped

One of the problems with our current food system, is we are effectively trapped, in many different ways.

All over the world small farmers have been disadvantaged for decades, and there aren’t a lot of them left.  We certainly aren’t in a position to turn to them and expect them to feed the world today.  They certainly have the potential to do it over time, but not immediately.

One of the major obstacles to small farmers are all the laws, rules, regulations, intellectual property rights and consumer expectations.  The big seed and agricultural companies have had decades of exclusive control over these things, and they all take time to change.  For a long time now, the agriculture companies have been collecting patents and other rights on almost all of the worlds food supplies or potential food supplies, that it’s unlikely anyone except them will have future rights to sell us food.

The big seed and chemical companies of today are making good money, and have little reason to change.   Occasionally there is a concession here or there, like providing certified organic or fairtrade foods, but these often come at much higher cost to the consumer.  It’s often argued that organic or fairtrade foods aren’t ‘special’, they’re normal!  It’s processed foods and foods grown with chemicals that are special, and these should be sold at their true and unsubsidized prices.  But even if the big seed and chemical companies were to see the err of their ways tomorrow, there’s too much momentum in our current food system, and it would take decades to unravel.  A big issue in unravelling the current system is meeting consumer expectations, because there would be big changes in the food we eat.

There are huge environmental obstacles to overcome.  Nearly all of the worlds agriculture land has been seriously damaged by modern farming methods.  There’s a common myth that all land is suitable for organic production after 3 years, no matter what, because this is part of the definition of certified organic foods.  There’s a big difference between certified organic, and being able to produce abundant food with organic and environmentally friendly methods.

Finally, governments are trapped into paying huge subsidies.  The big agricultural companies control the laws, rules, regulations and intellectual property rights, then turn to governments for subsidies.  It’s a sort of legalized extortion.  If they don’t get their ever increasing subsidies, they won’t produce food.  Politicians don’t want to see food shortages!  There’s no indication subsidies are coming down any time soon.

What Can you Do?

Forget everything you’ve ever learned about nutrition.  Forget about calories, protein, carbohydrates, Omega-3, sugar, salt — everything.  Don’t buy any food that has related health claims.  Food companies regularly spend billions of dollars on this sort of education, and in Europe alone recently spent €1,000,000,000 (that’s right, 9 zeros) lobbying for the new European food labels, to teach consumers how to buy processed foods.  There is no proof that any health benefits can come by eating more or less of any of these things.  Don’t pay attention to these labels.

WHO guidelines state the healthiest diet is one that’s varied and based mostly on starchy carbohydrates like potatoes, rice, pasta, bread or other grains, and fruits and vegetables.  It should have some protein sources, like meat or fish if you eat it, but vegetables and whole grains are also a suitable source of protein if you’re vegetarian or vegan.

Buy food that’s as unprocessed as possible, and preferably directly from local farmers.  Choose normal, non-GMO sugar, over highly processed sugars like GMO high fructose corn syrup.  If it’s not possible to buy from local farmers, eat as low on the food chain as possible, emphasizing natural grains, fruits and vegetables, and other minimally refined foods from trusted sources.  Remember chain health food stores are often not any more ethical or environmentally friendly than supermarkets, and many of those are often accused of selling GMO products.

Don’t buy GMOs.

Eat vegetarian or vegan food, partly or completely.  You don’t need to be a raving lunatic who demonstrates in opposition to fur coats and leather shoes, or indeed even think meat doesn’t taste good, in order to enjoy good vegan food.  In fact most of the worlds population is vegan or nearly vegan, and not political or outspoken about their diet.  It’s not at all deviant, haute, trendy, lower class or unusual to enjoy vegan food.  There are no common or credible health issues associated with vegan food, and it’s not necessary to supplement it in any way.  You can just eat and enjoy it, and you don’t have to pay attention to any insensitivities,  accusations, demands, requirements or fear mongering from others.  Vegans are naturally just as healthy as anyone else, and in fact avoid many diseases associated with eating too much meat.  By eating vegetarian or vegan, you avoid all or most of the environmental and social issues that go along with meat and processed food production.

Think about where your food comes from and how it’s been made!  Use common sense, and avoid novel foods.  Read the label, and if it has too many or unfamiliar ingredients, don’t buy it.

Choose heirloom or world foods.   Quinoa is a great example!  These foods are often not yet patented, and farmers are able to save and replant their own seeds.  Like with quinoa, they have well established and sustainable methods for growing it, and high demand means more profits for small farmers!  Lots of other examples can often be found at farmers markets, or small local health food stores.

Choose foods with as few pesticides and grown as sustainably as possible, for example vegetables usually have fewer pesticide residues than fruit; cabbage family vegetables (broccoli, cauliflower, sprouts) usually have very few pesticide residues; and citrus and grapes are among the worst for residues.  Avoid certified organic unless you are buying a normally high pesticide residue food, or it comes from a local farmer.  Certified organic food is often unfair competition against small farmers who can’t afford to spend the time or money for certification.  Most small and local farmers can’t afford chemicals, so their produce is usually naturally pesticide free.

If you eat meat, think about where it comes from.  Raise it yourself, or buy it from a farmer who raises his animals on pasture.  Think about eating less meat.

World Hunger Caused by Vegans?

Worldwide Shortage of Quinoa!

I came across this silly article on quinoa the other day on the UK Guardian website.  I think it goes to show how uninformed many people are, about the food they eat and the world around them.  Have a look at some of the comments too, many of them are way off the mark.  Just for the record, it’s the nature of being a vegan that they try to avoid disrupting food supplies in this way, and it’s very unlikely they ever would.

Quinoa is a member of the Chenopodiaceae or ‘Goosefoot’ family, more or less a domesticated weed.  It grows in pretty much any agricultural area, and can even be grown in home gardens.  In spite of what the above article says, it has been grown by the Fife Diet people in the UK.  It does require some special equipment for processing like seed cleaning screens, and a way to remove the bitter saponins from the seed coats.  I’ve grown it before, here in Amsterdam.  It does not use an unusal amount of water, and there’s no reason for it to be imported from Bolivia or any area affected by drought.  If any unusual demand for this grain is disrupting supply and demand in any region, or markets are flooded with cheaper alternative foods that are less healthy, it’s only a symptom the world’s food supply is very broken.

It’s a good thing if more people eat quinoa.

If you’ve never had quinoa, it’s very nice!  You can eat it like rice.  It cooks just like white rice, with the same proportion of water.  It works fine in a rice cooker, which is what we use.  The flavor is more complex and a little bitter, and it’s a bit more filling than rice.  Start by making about half as much as you would normally rice, and taste it before mixing it in with other foods like fried rice or soup.

Quinoa is one of the so-called Lost Crops of the Incas, sometimes called Incan Rice.  It’s from the Andes, the same region as the potato, and has the potential to become a food as important as the potato.

Don’t be afraid to eat and enjoy it!

Have a look at this blog post by EcoSuave.

Piece of Junk Lexmark Printer

As many of us are getting ready to celebrate the biggest consumer oriented holiday of the year, I thought I would make a post about one of my biggest ever purchase mistakes.

lexmark

This is a 2 year old ‘all-in-1’ Lexmark printer with a built in scanner, soon to be discarded as a piece of junk.

It’s one thing to buy a printer of reasonable quality, and use it until it wears out after several years of normal use, to be replaced with newer technology.  It’s a totally different thing to be in a position like me of throwing away a relatively new appliance, in pretty good condition, because it was designed from the beginning to be obsolete and to intentionally become unreasonably expensive to operate.

As consumers we really need to reject products like this!

Chipped Ink Cartridges

Unknown to me when I bought this printer, Lexmark chips their ink cartridges in order to ensure other companies can’t make inexpensive generic alternatives and consumers can’t refill them.  A lot of printer companies do this, but Lexmark’s whole business model revolves around selling you a cheap printer, and ripping you off with ink cartridge replacements!

To begin with this printer uses an above average amount of ink, black plus 3 colors.  All these cartridges have an electronic chip in them that must be present or the printer will not function.  In addition, the printer tracks the amount of ink used, and when it ‘thinks’ the cartridge is empty you are forced to replace it, regardless of how full it is.

Along with this, Lexmark markets several series of physically identical cartridges, with different model numbers and chips.  Their more expensive printers use cheaper cartridges, and the cheaper printers use more expensive cartridges.  Even though these ink cartridges are identical, the chips keep you from installing the wrong model number for your printer.

On the Internet you can find a number of workarounds.  Moving the chips from one cartridge to another, cycling the power on the printer 5 or 6 times to make it ‘forget’ it’s already used a particular cartridge, and so on.  In the end, none of these worked for me, and all the suggestions did was cause me to buy slightly cheaper cartridges, incorrectly making me think I could make them work.  More wasted money on purchased junk to be thrown away.

Scanner

One of the reasons for getting this model was the scanner, in order to email and post documents.

As it turns out, the version of Adobe’s pdf software it uses to generate pdf files is incompatible with Apple computers.  It’s known the relationship between Adobe and Apple haven’t been good for a long time, but given the above mentioned constraints on this printer, you have to assume the reason this version of pdf is installed is intentional.

Do you remember a few years ago, when Microsoft promoted the used of Word documents in emails?  In this case the recipient couldn’t read them unless they had a current version of office on their computer.  It was intended to frustrate non-Microsoft users as well as those using older versions of Windows.  This is clearly the same idea, intended to frustrate Apple users as well as make me want to buy an upgraded printer.

Finished

So I’ve had enough buying ripoff cartridges and pretending it’s okay that Apple users can’t read my pdfs.  It’s time to throw the printer away.  I will never buy another Lexmark product, and indeed be suspicious of any store that even sells them.

Spread the word!

Noxious Weed

I’ve just been email chatting with Julien of the blog Noxious Weed.  He’s in France, and his blog is French and English.

Julien is a plant breeder, and is growing lots of interesting things in his garden.  His blog is worth keeping an eye on!

EU Commission Legislating Hunger and Poverty

A month ago I mentioned new EU legislation is being drafted to replace the current infamous ‘seed laws’.  It’s time for an update, and it’s not good news I’m afraid.

The normal procedure on this sort of thing is the EU agriculture ministers meet in a secret location, behind closed doors, and amend EU law with a secret voice vote, all totally immune to public opinion or accountability.  This time at least the legislation is following more formal procedures, and is being drafted under some public scrutiny.  Otherwise it seems like business as usual.  The legislation currently being considered is very draconian, represents a major set back for biodiversity, farmers rights and consumers rights, and the EU Commission doesn’t seem very concerned with any opinions from the pro-biodiversity side.

Two drafts have been tabled so far, and the trend is for a reaffirmation of the existing system, but with the removal of the few existing derivations (elements of flexibility).  There’s really nothing in this legislation to benefit biodiversity, with the exception of a non-binding introductory statement on the cover page.  The outcome of this legislation can only mean a continuing and acceleration of the process of spreading hunger and poverty around the world via EU trade policies.

In the past EU agriculture has been regulated with a series of patchwork directives, all interpreted a little differently under national legislation.  The measure being considered is a regulation, meaning it will come into force directly as EU law, without any flexibility of local interpretation.  In addition there are many pending elements of the regulation, ‘delegated acts’, which basically means they are to be decided later by committee.  This means we’re currently discussing a very abstract piece of legislation.

What we’ve all heard in the past is that politicians don’t want to spread famine and poverty around the world.  They say they themselves are not experts on this sort of thing and have to take the word of seed companies.  They say they never get any input from seed savers, as incredible as that seems.  It’s as if we’re all invisible or don’t exist.

Here’s my latest input, on behalf of all of you.  It’s proof this time we’re at the table, ready to talk.  This time they won’t be able to claim they haven’t heard from us.  They can’t say we didn’t warn them.

If anyone is interested in following the details of the legislation and/or participating in lobbying efforts, let me know and I’ll get more information to you.