Field Liberation Day in Belgium Declared a Success

On their Dutch and French language blog, organizers of the Field Liberation Day action in Wetteren, Belgium declared their success. They also published a multi-lingual dossier on the GM potatoes here, English is mixed in with other languages.

On the 29th of May about 500 people gathered at the trial fields. A broad mix of people including professionals, scientists, farmers, young and old.

Standing between them and the potatoes were about 60 police officers dressed in full riot gear prepared for battle, a 2 meter high fence, razor wire and electronic sensors.

As the demonstration progressed about half the participants, 250 or so, penetrated the barrier and entered the trial fields. There were about 30 arrests, and prosecutions are expected to follow.

While the fields sustained about 20% damage on the day of the action, some participants returned in the days following to continue damaging the fields.

Civil action is expected against the demonstrators, as the multinationals behind the trials claim financial damages.

The demonstrators are now looking to build a support network; including moral, legal, logistical, financial and other help. If anyone reading this would like to participate, let me know and I’ll make sure you’re in contact with the right people. I think you can also probably contact them via their blog I linked to above.

Bees

One of the things uncovered by demonstrators were beehives kept 30 meters from the potato trial fields. A glimpse of this is shown in the last few seconds of the second video.

University Researcher Fired

A few days following the action in Wetteren, academic researcher Barbara Van Dyck was fired by the Catholic University of Leuven . She wasn’t fired because she trespassed, damaged anything or broke any laws. She was fired because she was present during the demonstration, outside of working hours on a Sunday, and voiced her public support. She was fired for performing what in many places in the world are constitutional rights.

Just in case any of us thought universities were places of free thought and expression, now we all know we were wrong.

Regardless of your personal views on the Field Liberation Day, please consider signing the petition to ask for her reinstatement and sending an email to the University. Details can be found here.

Free Expression

So much of what happened on May 29th comes down to freedom of expression and proportionality of actions.

Sixty police in riot gear? If I ever had problems with vandalism in my garden, even if I knew who it was and had dates and times in advance, I would never get the attention of the police here. It doesn’t matter if I had a breeding project, or if I had years of time an effort invested into what I was doing. It’s also not just me as an individual, but we have the same problem at my community garden complex where we have 50+ gardens, problems with vandalism, and the police won’t do anything about it.

If I were to grow something provocative, for example marijuana (which is permitted here in small amounts), and my garden was overrun with 19-year old stoner-vandals, I might even get into trouble with the police for creating problems.

What’s more provocative than a field of GM potatoes? The people behind the planting of the field are as much or more to blame for it’s destruction than the demonstrators themselves.

There isn’t any court in the Netherlands that would award me more than market value if a field of potatoes in my garden were destroyed by vandals and I sued for damages. It doesn’t matter how much work I put into growing and possibly breeding them. Face it, even if you could find someone who wanted to buy and eat them, the potatoes aren’t worth more than 50 cents a pound. What’s this talk of civil action…arrests and prosecution…over potatoes?!

This is very much the same logic of Monsanto suing farmers like Percy Schmeiser when their crops become contaminated with GMOs, and it’s abuse of the justice system and civil courts.

Anyone reading this who has ever had a garden or farm knows that, however distasteful it may be, destroying someone else’s plants and the work behind them is mindless and no problem at all. Build a wall and block the light. Enter at night and pull the plants up. Throw salt on them. Spray them with herbicide. Pollute the genetics of wild crop relatives with GMOs, so organic seed saving is more difficult or impossible. This can easily be done by 3-4 people in the darkness of night, and hundreds of people aren’t necessary.

As growers of plants we are totally at the mercy of nature, natural disasters, climate change, genetically modified crops and even vandals. We all need to take all of these things into account when we grow things, and roll with the punches as they come.

The people being punished for participating in or supporting Field Liberation Day, are not being punished for the destruction of $100 worth of potatoes, they’re being punished for bringing 500 people together to express ideas and opinions and filming 60 riot police beating unarmed demonstrators. They’re being punished for making us all think about what a monstrosity research into GM crops has become, together with all the politics and unfair laws behind it.

Supposedly it all comes down to us consumers. What I hear is if we don’t accept GM foods, they won’t be sold. Has anyone else heard that too? I don’t think the big agro-chemical companies have heard this yet.

Does it really come down to destroying one another’s work before the message is heard?

EU Seed Law Consultation

I posted about this before.  They changed to an online submission form, and below are the answers as I submitted them.

Please, no matter where in the world you live, consider filling out the online form and giving your opinion about EU seeds laws.

You don’t have very much time.  Submissions have to be made this weekend to be on time.
1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 What is the name of your organisation?
Bifurcated Carrots
1.2 What stakeholder group does your organisation belong to? (multiple answers possible) Breeder of S&PM
Supplier of S&PM
User of S&PM
Consumer
International organisation
1.3 Please write down the address (postal, e-mail, telephone, fax and web page if available) of your organisation
weblogbb@patnsteph.net http://bifurcatedcarrots.eu/
2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
2.1 Are the problems defined correctly in the context of S&PM marketing? No
2.2 Have certain problems been overlooked? Yes
2.2.1 Please state which one(s):
The loss of biodiversity as a result of the limited nature of DUS and VCU rules. The inability of small breeders and suppliers to make good use of the listings. The limited availability of high quality food to consumers, as a result of the limited nature of the listings. The unnecessary expense to small farmers as a result of being required to purchase seeds from a limited number of suppliers.
2.3 Are certain problems underestimated or overly emphasized? Overestimated
2.3.1 Please indicate the problems that have not been estimated rightly:
The emphasis should be on food-soveringty and not food-security.
2.4 Other suggestions or remarks:
The EU legislation is unfair to everyone except large multinational companies.
3. OBJECTIVES OF THE REVIEW
3.1 Are the objectives defined correctly in the context of S&PM marketing? No
3.2 Have certain objectives been overlooked? Yes
3.2.1 Please state which one(s):
The accessibility to heritage varieties, unstable varieties (for example F3) for use in creating locally adapted varieties and newly bred varieties created by small or independent plant breeders.
3.3 Are certain objectives inappropriate? No
3.4 Is it possible to have a regime whereby a variety is considered as being automatically registered in an EU catalogue as soon as a variety protection title is granted by CPVO? No opinion
3.5 If there is a need to prioritise the objectives, which should be the most important ones? (Please rank 1 to 5, 1 being first priority)
Ensure availability of healthy high quality seed and propagating material 3
Secure the functioning of the internal market for seed and propagating material 4
Empower users by informing them about seed and propagating material 5
Contribute to improve biodiversity, sustainability and favour innovation 1
Promote plant health and support agriculture, horticulture and forestry 2
3.6 Other suggestions and remarks:
Adequate biodiversity cannot be maintained in marketing listings as long as DUS remains a requirement.
4. OPTIONS FOR CHANGE
4.1 Are the scenarios defined correctly in the context of S&PM marketing? No
4.2 Have certain scenarios been overlooked? Yes
4.2.1 Please state which one(s):
Elimination of marketing lists for non novel foods.
4.3 Are certain scenarios unrealistic? Yes
4.3.1 Please state which one(s) and why:
1. This would be unfair for smaller businesses and limit choices for consumers. 2. Same as 1 3. Same as 1 and 2 above, in particular smaller companies would not have the capacity to perform these tests by themselves. 4. Any registration system would favor larger commercial organizations and limit consumer choice. 5. Same as 1, 2 and 3 above.
4.4 Do you agree with the reasoning leading to the discard of the “no-changes” and the “abolishment” scenarios? No
4.5 Other suggestions and remarks:
It is not fair to push registration costs back to companies making the registrations. This means unreasonable costs for smaller companies.
5. ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS
5.1 Are the impacts correctly analysed in the context of S&PM marketing? No
5.2 Have certain impacts been overlooked? Yes
5.2.1 Please state which one(s):
You are ignoring the fact that wile jobs relating to variety registration would be lost, many more jobs would be created in the independent plant breeding and small farming sectors, in the event of liberalization of EU marketing rules.
5.3 Are certain impacts underestimated or overly emphasized? Overestimated
5.3.1 Please provide evidence or data to support your assessment:
Your assessment on job losses is flawed.
5.4 How do you rate the proportionality of a generalised traceability/labelling and fit-for-purpose requirement (as set out in scenario 4)? 5 = not proportional at all
5.5 How do you assess the possible impact of the various scenarios on your organisation or on the stakeholders that your organisation represents?
Scenario 1 Very negative
Scenario 2 Very negative
Scenario 3 Very negative
Scenario 4 Very negative
Scenario 5 Very negative
5.5.1 Please state your reasons for your answers above, where possible providing evidence or data to support your assessment:
You are ignoring very strong public opposition to current EU seed laws, and proposed changes thereof.
6. ASSESSMENT OF SCENARIOS
6.1 Which scenario or combination of scenarios would best meet the objectives of the review of the legislation? Scenario with new features
6.1.1 Please explain the new scenario in terms of key features:
Complete liberalization of market in terms of traditionally bred varieties. Genuine safety testing for novel foods, no patents or IPRs. Prohibition of GMOs pending environmental impact assessment, establishment of genuine need and true value and consumer demand. True responsiveness to consumer wises from the EU commission.
6.2 Do you agree with the comparison of the scenarios in the light of the potential to achieve the objectives? No opinion
7. OTHER COMMENTS
7.1 Further written comments on the seeds and propagating material review:
I am opposed to patents or other IPRs. I am opposed to marketing lists, except when they are an expression of consumer demand. The amount of GMOs allowed in food should be lowered to 0%. The EU should emphasize food soverignty as opposed to food security. The EU seed laws are a violation to human rights all over the world.
7.2 Please make reference here to any available data/documents that support your answer, or indicate sources where such data/documents can be found:

Monsanto Lawsuit

It’s been mentioned now by several people, and I haven’t posted about it yet.  This is big news, especially for those of you in the US I think.

Most major OP/Heirloom seed companies (more than 60 plaintiffs) in the US have gotten together to pre-emptively sue Monsanto to prevent being held liable if genes from Monsanto’s new GM varieties should end up in seeds belonging to others.  In addition, they are challenging the validity of some of Monsanto’s patents.

Notable in their absence is the Seed Savers Exchange, who has better things to spend their money on then suing Monsanto (with about $800,000[updated] cash on hand according to recent financial filings):

I appreciate the discussion here. As a non-profit, Seed Savers Exchange uses its limited resources to maintain our collection and seed bank here at Heritage Farm and promote participatory preservation through our membership. This is a full time job. We leave advocacy and policy work to other organizations, such as Organic Seed Alliance and ETC Group, two groups that we often partner with. We believe our mission speaks for itself and offers a counterpoint to the agribusiness model, which is at the heart of the litigation you speak of.

John Torgrimson
President and Executive Director
Seed Savers Exchange

Have a look at the page Baker Creek put up about the lawsuit for more information.

What do you think?  Is it going to help?  Will they win?

Ethical Bulk Bean Seeds in the US

Paul, a reader in New Hampshire in the US recently sent me an email with a good question.  He wants to buy heirloom/OP bean seeds in 1lb packages, and wants to know where in the US he can do this ethically?

He said he’s read what I’ve written earlier about the Seed Savers Exchange, and their various statements on their website, and doesn’t want to buy from them.

He said he bought some seeds from a company I won’t mention here (but Paul can mention it in the comments if he wants), and they came packaged in fake plastic bags made of GMO corn manufactured by ‘Cargill’, and he doesn’t want to buy from them again.

Anyone have any suggestions?

I’ve looked around, and emailed Paul some suggestions, but it’s surprisingly difficult to find a company selling bean seeds in this way.

If anyone out there is themselves selling bean seeds in bulk, let me know and I’ll forward your email address to Paul.

Brussels Action 17-18 April 2011 — La Via Campesina Video

I didn’t post this before because I was having trouble with the embed code from their website, but this is a video posted by La Via Campesina just before the Brussels seed swap and demonstration. La Via Campesina is the organization that called for the days of action in Brussels.

If you’re having trouble viewing this video embedded here in this page, you might try downloading a copy onto your own computer from this page.