Here’s a Google translated version of the open letter published in the Flemish newspaper De Morgen from the eleven scientists who chose to participate in Field Liberation Day.
You can find the original Dutch language version here.
Here is a reply from the scientists who opposed the demonstration.
The original Dutch language version is here.
Here’s a quote from the second letter:
Sleep comfortable
Just think: what carries the least risk to humans and the environment? A potato with well-characterized resistance genes (the GM version) or a potato with the same genes in it and also a lot of other genes that we all know nothing (and bionica and toluca example)? If you do not see dangers in the use of bionica and toluca varieties, sleep on both ears in terms of the GM potato.
Part of the strange language here is the translation from Dutch, and I’ve fixed it a little by hand, but the point is clear. From a scientist’s point of view — fewer genetics are better. The traditionally bred blight resistant varieties Bionica and Toluca are dangerous to plant, because they have too many unknown and not useful genes in them! Really?
The only way forward is monocultures, and as little biodiversity as possible? Otherwise humans and the environment are at risk? If you don’t agree, sleep comfortably on both ears? This is like president Bush telling the world they were either with him or against him in Iraq. I don’t think this is the basis for common ground.