Let Them Eat Windows

Jeremy of the Agricultural Biodiversity Weblog made two posts recently about the Bill and Melinda Gates foundations decision to dramatically increase the amount of money they give to support agriculture in some of the worlds poorest countries. Jeremy’s posts are here and here.

Two somewhat conflicting articles can be found in the New York Times and The Seattle Post.

One thing is for sure, the Gates Foundation looks set to have a big influence on how agriculture is developed in many parts of the world. It also seems likely many of us will take issue with how this unfolds.

Will this aid emphasize new technologies like GM varieties, high input systems requiring large amounts of energy, pesticides and nitrogen based fertilizers? Will it emphasize sustainable local food systems or export crops? Will it seek to relieve poverty, or simply drive farmers into cycles of debt and dependence on corporate products?

Seed Swaps

Emma of The Fluffius Muppetus blog and The Alternative Kitchen Garden podcast just reminded me it’s the season for seed swaps.  Check out her latest podcast.

For those of you in the UK within traveling distance of Brighton, you may want to visit Seedy Sunday on 3 February.  Everyone else will have to search around themselves.  I’m sure there are Seedy Saturdays and Sundays going on across Canada this year, and the links on the front of this blog may help you find more information about these.

For those of you who don’t have any seeds to share, these events almost always have free seeds or seeds available for purchase.

No to GMOs in Europe

The European Union is in the final throws of approving commercial planting of GM crops, the result of pressure from the US, Canada and Argentina. Enough is enough! Europe does not need GM products.

GM crops do not offer any benefit to the consumer or farmer. There is no evidence that any claims of disease resistance, insect resistance or increased yields made by the manufacturers are true in the long term. The only benefit is for the seed companies, so they can own the rights to the food we eat, and spread that ownership by contaminating the environment and our food with their genetic material.

No to GM in Our Food

0.9% GM material is currently allowed, even in certified organic foods. Just who thought of this limit anyway! This limit should be 0%. There is currently no formal or mandatory testing. Testing should be mandatory, and when food is found above legal limits it should be promptly removed from the market.

No GM for Livestock

Most meat and dairy products in Europe are produced with GM animal feed. There is no reason for this, and it should be stopped at once.

Certified organic animals are not allowed to be fed GM feed, but there is no formal testing for this. Random informal testing suggests 20% of supposed GM-free animal feed in fact contains more than the allowed 0.9% level of GM materials. Mandatory testing and enforcement of these limits should be put in place.

No More Trials

For years now permission has been given for trial plantings of GM crops in Europe.

These trials should stop.  We don’t need any GM crops grown here.

No to Products Made from GM Organisms

Many common products such as rennet used in hard cheeses, vitamins and food supplements, aspartame sweetener and pharmaceuticals are made with the assistance of genetically modified bacteria, yeasts or other microorganisms. There are many suspected or known health problems associated with these products, many very serious and life threatening.

Some of these are certifiable organic ingredients and can be in organic foods!

Those products which can be replaced with alternatives and products which have no true clinical value should be removed from the market, and those remaining should be clearly labelled for what they are.

Certified Organic Can Be Bad for Small and Local

GRAIN recently published an article about the politics of certified organic seeds.

While every country has a slightly different interpretation of the rule, generally speaking, certified organic food must be grown with certified organic seeds when they are available.

This sounds innocent enough, even logical to some people. As innocent as it sounds it’s a really insidious rule that makes things very difficult for some small farmers and decreases global biodiversity.

No Significant Difference

While no one should use treated seeds in their garden, and organic foods certainly should not be grown from treated seeds, the use of organic seeds doesn’t make any sense.

The root of the definition of certified organic is the plants should be grown on land that has not come in contact with chemical fertilizers and pesticides for two years. By the time you purchase and grow any seed in your garden, two years will have almost certainly passed since the parent plant could have been sprayed anyway.

If you are purchasing an OP or heirloom variety of plant, there is a reduced chance pesticides or other chemicals would have been used in it’s production. This is because a large portion of the chemicals used in agriculture are used to make produce appear cosmetically perfect or to protect it from spoilage. These chemicals aren’t needed when seed is produced. This doesn’t apply to F1 hybrid varieties, for which toxic chemicals are frequently used, and presumably these chemicals are allowed under organic certification because organic F1 seeds are widely available.

The chance of transporting chemicals of any significance into your garden or dinner table with an untreated purchased seed is infinitessimally small. First the original plant has to be sprayed, then the chemical must find it’s way to the very small seed, then the seed decomposes in your garden leaving a new plant in it’s place. It’s virtually impossible any chemical residue could be left behind that is any higher than what’s already present in your garden anyway. If you add supermarket vegetable scraps to your compost, you have a much greater chance of adding chemicals to your garden than using non organic seeds.

There is no possibility organic seeds can produce better plants. When you grow a seed, you are simply using it’s DNA. If a seed germinates and grows into a plant, that plant will be the same regardless if it came from an organic seed or not. There are simply no realistic possibilities for any differences to exist.

If you save your own seeds and trade with your fellow gardeners, the idea of organic seeds becomes a non-issue anyway. This is one more reason why we should all be doing this.

No Big Favors to the Environment Either

Of course one of the reasons many people buy organic foods is to help protect the environment. As anyone who has ever saved their own seeds will tell you, the amount of seeds that comes from a single plant is enormous. You can easily plant one seed and get thousands as a result.

Seed production is not as chemically intensive as producing market produce anyway, and the amount of land needed is a tiny fraction of that used in agriculture.

How Could Organic Be Bad?

The problem comes about in the interpretation of the rule ‘organic seeds must be used, when available’.

In North America many smaller seed companies specializing in OP and heritage varieties, knowing they could soon be shut out of the chain of organic agriculture if they didn’t, have been arranging their own organic certifications. This means in this part of the world organic seeds are widely available for most of the common OP and heirloom varieties. Probably for this reason, the certifying agencies have not been very strict about requiring the use of organic seeds.

In Europe and many other places in the world, it’s a very different story.

In Europe there are a very complicated set of rules governing the production of seeds for agriculture. In particular purchased seeds must come from a licensed source and generally can only be modern commercial varieties. Under limited circumstances, farmers are allowed to save their own seeds, but never to sell or trade them. For farmer grown seeds to be considered organic they must have been grown for two consecutive years first. It’s virtually impossible under realistic circumstances for farmers to maintain their own collections of seeds for their own varieties. If farmers can’t maintain their own seed collections, most heritage and OP varieties cannot be purchased as certified organic.

What’s happening in Europe right now, and the Netherlands was singled out by the GRAIN report above as being one of the worst offenders, is certain classes of crops are being closed when it comes to considering if organic seed is unavailable.

For example, the organic certifying agencies might simply say there are enough certified organic cauliflower seeds on the market, so no organic farmer can claim they can’t find certified organic cauliflower seeds. No arguments are accepted over the varieties available or the price seed companies are asking. Farmers who want to grow organic cauliflower must either have saved their own seeds for the past two years or purchase organic seeds from one of the companies selling them. There would be no other possibilities.

Who are these companies selling the organic seeds?

Referring to the Netherlands in particular, since this was addressed in the GRAIN report, one company called Vitalis controls 82% of the market for organic cauliflower seeds.

In each one of these classes of crops being closed for consideration of organic seeds not being available, only a small number of large companies control the seed market, leaving them in a position to charge virtually whatever they want.

Some Wise Words on Bees and CCD

Felicia Gilljam recently made a great post on her blog about Colony Collapse Disorder. She is a beekeeper and biology student, and offered her perspective on the problem from that point of view.

An American problem because beekeeping is much more industrialized there? Bad weather? The result of breeding for docility, repressed swarming behaviour and increased harvests? These are all things she discusses.

As was touched on in the comments, my personal opinion is that CCD is more than anything a result of the general degradation of the environment caused by global warming, intensive agriculture and mono-cultures and the ongoing loss of global biodiversity. It’s not that very serious attention shouldn’t be paid to CCD, and effort shouldn’t go into understanding it better, but the only real solution is going to be to address the underlying problems.