Is it Time for Revolution in America?

Many will disagree with me of course, but in my eyes America has lost most senses of democracy.  Is it time for the American people to follow in the footsteps of the Egyptian people, and march on the capitol demanding the resignation of the government?  Would another form of peaceful revolution work better?

One of the problems of course is the diversity of public opinion in America, and the need to focus the goals of a mass demonstration that has broad public support.  Would it be to cut spending, reduce the size of government, reverse Obama’s health care reform or break the deadlock in congress?  Would it be to call for more socially oriented fiscal policies; to tackle unemployment, help home owners facing foreclosure, eliminate tax breaks for the rich or just reduce the gap between rich and poor like Bob Herbert of the New York Times suggests?

What’s the single cause for everyone to focus on?  What would it take to unite the American people in peaceful opposition to their government?  Certainly if the last few elections were any indication, the ballot box is not the way to go.

 

***Sorry, comments on this post are closed.***

The Big Light Bulb Ripoff

I’ve posted before on The Truth About Energy-Saving Light Bulbs.  It’s clear the battle lines between the manufactures and consumers are being drawn and the situation is changing a bit, so I thought it was time for another post.

Being Lied To

Do you notice how this has changed?  Before we were told CFLs were 80% more efficient than ordinary incandescent bulbs.  In my earlier post I explained how, even based solely on electricity consumption, this figure was an outright lie.  By the time you took into account things like manufacturing and transportation costs, as unlike standard bulbs CFLs are pretty much only made in China, and disposal costs because these bulbs need special handling and transportation due to the toxic materials they contain, it’s unlikely there was any energy savings at all with these bulbs.

Not to mention being told by the manufacturers that it was safe to have mercury in our homes!  Can you imagine that, someone else telling us this?  Who wants toxic heavy metals in their home in any amount?  And for what reason exactly?

Can you believe this, they almost got away with putting toxic materials in nearly every home worldwide?  Are people gullible or what?!  But this is okay, isn’t it — now we know CFLs are a piece of crap, we can throw them all away and buy the next round of consumer products.

Do you notice they’ve stopped with all the propaganda?  At least in the shops here in Amsterdam, they’ve quietly moved the bulbs made from toxic materials to the side in favor of other technologies.  They’ve also stopped telling us in such a deceitful way the newer bulbs are so extremely efficient like they used to.

Now it’s more like, here, buy this bulb because it’s the law.

They’ve also quietly stopped telling us the newer bulbs last longer.  What they’re now doing is making standard light bulbs that burn out much faster than they did a few years ago.  We just discarded a bulb purchased 15 years ago, and have been using daily in a floor lamp for about the last 5 years.  How long has it been since we could buy a standard light bulb that lasted 5 years?  There’s no reason standard incandescent bulbs can’t be made for a longer life, in fact if you search the Internet with Google you will see a number of places selling these bulbs in countries like China where they’re still legal.

To be very clear on this, there is absolutely no evidence beyond wild claims from from manufacturers that expensive bulbs pay themselves back in energy savings.  Remember when cigarette companies used to claim their products were safe and not addicting?  As long as no one can come up with absolute proof to the contrary, they can claim whatever they want.

The Demise of the 15w Bulb

Supposedly they started with the phasing out of 100w and 75w bulbs, as well as all frosted bulbs.  They also assured us stores would continue to be able to stock older bulbs, and they would continue to be available for a while.

Boy, I haven’t seen any stores stocking older bulbs, have you?  If you ran a store, would you want to keep low value stock like that laying around?

It’s this frosted bulb bit that’s the hidden detail.  This seems to have a number of unexpected consequences.  The first is 15w bulbs have totally disappeared from the stores, apparently because they can’t be made unfrosted.

Well we can all understand, at least from an emotional point of view, why they would ban 100w and 75w bulbs, right?  Because they use so much electricity?  Why do they need to ban the one incandescent bulb logical for someone who needs a small energy efficient light for a small space?  After all, for someone who does want to lower their electric bill, and wants to replace a higher wattage bulb with a more efficient cheap one, a 15w bulb would be the logical way to do it.  Is this too much competition for other supposedly energy saving light bulbs?

The Big Consumer Ripoff

Ten years ago light bulbs could be had for 10 or 20 cents, purchased in a package of 20 or so bulbs from a discount retailer.

Especially as the price of oil is going up, the true manufacturing and transportation costs of these new bulbs is really showing itself!  These days it’s hard to find a light bulb for less than about €1 (around US$1.35), about a 500% mark-up from a few years ago.  These prices are only going to go up if the manufacturers of the newer technologies are given a monopoly on the market.

It’s not acceptable to just lower the price a bit now, and take a loss, maybe put them on sale.  Maybe a government subsidy here and there to distribute free or discounted bulbs.  As consumers we have the right to access to cheaper technologies, as protection against future prices rises or market manipulations.  If the new lighting technologies are so great, let them stand the test of time!

It’s not just incandescent bulbs that are becoming unavailable, it’s fixtures and devices like timers, switches and motion detectors.  These are now becoming packaged with newer bulbs and fittings, forcing you to use a particular brand or type of bulb.

Svalbard Global Seed Vault

Too Many Genebanks?

This is the position of Cary Fowler, Executive Director of the Crop Diversity Trust.

According to Fowler, genebanks are like the economy or an IT company, and when you have too many of them the bubble bursts.  Does everyone see that connection?

Maybe the question should be, does anyone see that connection?

This isn’t the first time Fowler has made use of strange and irrelevant rhetoric.  Take for example his recent statements as board member of the American seed saving organization, the Seed Savers Exchange.  In this case his comments provoked an outcry, accusations of lying and calls for his resignation.  No one was interested in his ridiculous statements about how physically safe the seeds stored in the vault were.  The discussion at hand was the terms and conditions of their deposit at Svalbard, and their use in scientific research and subsequent patenting.  Fowler’s claims of security of the seeds were particularly irrelevant considering most of the seeds were available on request to anyone via the SSE, and in any case the terms of the deposit required samples be made available to other depositors via the SSE office in Decorah, Iowa.

Principles of Biodiversity

Fowler’s statements in this recent newsletter violate many of the basic principles of biodiversity, for example the idea that genebanks should not hold ‘duplicate’ deposits.

This is the argument often used by seed companies with regards to intellectual property rights, or for example lists of permitted varieties used in Europe and elsewhere.  For these purposes, all varieties have to be Distinct, Uniform and Stable, the so-called DUS standard.  While handy for identifying those varieties for patenting, this represents a severe degradation of biodiversity and excludes the possibility of special varieties adapted to local growing conditions, or landraces.

These so-called duplicate deposits referred to by Fowler contain very small and important differences that could be key to developing future crops in a world of climate change and environmental degradation.  It’s also a logical measure to take with important varieties, to store them in more than one place for safety, and genebanks often trade deposits for this purpose.  You can never store any variety too many places!

Basic Greed

The terms of the depositors agreement of Svalbard Global Seed Vault places these seeds under control of the FAO treaty.  This guarantees availability of the deposits for research and patenting by other signatories and can result in a loss of rights by the depositor and country of origin, but gives no rights to ordinary people.  It’s possible for one country to deposit the seeds of another, as has happened with the US depositing a large number of Mexican corn varieties.  This has apparently happened without the permission of Mexico, who is not even a signatory of the treaty.

Fowler’s actions at the SSE and now this attack on the world’s genebanks, only stem from greed and his desire to see more of the worlds genetic resources taken out of the hands of people and local control, and put under the control of multinationals and the world’s more powerful nations.

Few nations and organizations have so far voluntarily placed their seeds in Svalbard.  Now it’s time to put enough pressure on the worlds remaining genebanks, making them fail, and leaving them with no choice but turning their seeds over to him.  After all, fewer genebanks means fewer jurisdictions and fewer negotiations.

Does Anyone Have ‘Free Seeds’?

As the global economy is struggling along these days, I’m increasingly approached by people with an open request for ‘free seeds’.  In particular the last few months they’ve come from Pakistan.

I believe these requests are genuine, but I’m not really sure what to do with them.

I don’t really have the kind of seeds someone should grow in a climate very different from mine and expect to feed themselves.  I’m also really only prepared to send out small samples, for people to regrow and save their own seeds.

In today’s world we fund organizations like the Red Cross, who are supposed to work for the common good in times of crisis, and in fact do really good work.  When it comes down to helping one person in need, as a world we really fail.  There’s usually no place for these people to turn to.

Does anyone have any suggestions for sources of ‘free seeds’ in cases like this?  I can only imagine requests like this are going to become more common.

New UN Panel on Biodiversity

While many of us were preparing for our Christmas holidays, the UN quietly announced the creation of a new biodiversity panel.  It’s hard to know exactly what this means, but hopefully we will see some real science applied to this area, with some real influence on lawmakers around the world.

Normally I would have read about this first on the Agricultural Biodiversity Weblog, but like many they’re on holiday now.  As a parting gift to us all, they left a link to a Futurama episode on biodiversity.  Be sure to have a look, and make sure to watch the whole episode, not just the teaser.