Update: PDF of the letter is available here.
I seem to be one of the first few to receive Kent Whealy’s latest letter to members of the Seed Savers Exchange. I don’t see a lot of discussion about it on the Internet yet. In the past he didn’t send his letters to overseas members of the SSE, and this time international postal delivery seemed to have worked in my favor and I got it here in Amsterdam before people in North America.
Anyhow, I thought I would be one of the first to write some thoughts about it. In short it’s a 14 page letter (breaking his previous record of 8 pages), detailing his grievances with the SSE and in particular with Amy Goldman and the other board members.
I think it’s pretty fitting while we get this letter the leader of Honduras is trying to regain control of his country he lost under similar circumstances. Even though many people have problems with President Manuel Zelaya personally, he has wide spread support around the world because the coup that ousted him breaches international laws and norms. This isn’t the right way to oust a leader you don’t like.
The same applies to Kent Whealy, you don’t just cast the founder of an organization out on the street and tell him to shut up.
I am particularly repulsed at the way the SSE has attempted to silence it’s critics. If you try to discuss Kent on their Internet forum, you will surely be banned. There was at least one person I know of who was banned from the forum a few days ago, apparently in a pre-emptive strike, but in fairness he was reinstated after it was determined to be a mistake.
Kent himself has been harassed by lawyers from the SSE, a situation he compared with Monsanto suing the roughly 450 farmers who have had their crops contaminated with GM genes, then silencing them with non-disclosure agreements. When the SSE isn’t threatening him with legal action, they are offering him huge amounts of money to shut up.
The SSE shows many symptoms of an organization losing control of their objectives and purpose. Many members have commented they seem to be out of touch with what their members want. Above all else, I call on the SSE to stop trying to control what people say or think. The days are past where people appreciate this.
If there are members of the SSE management who can’t stand up to their critics, it’s time for them to step down. There isn’t anyone in the SSE’s management who is simply ‘entitled’ to be in the position they are in. If anyone exposed their own weaknesses in the course of terminating Kent Whealy’s employment, it’s time for them to leave too.