It’s in the news again. The three evil foods; salt, sugar and saturated fat. As if these were really foods in the first place. We all know we are supposed to be distracted from caring about the quality of our foods, if it’s natural and if it comes from a trustworthy place, by focusing on the ingredient label for a look at it’s component parts. The reason of course is that food companies don’t want to fundamentally change the way they produce food, to make it more natural or healthy. Processing food a different way is however no problem, and generating consumer demand based on the ingredient list means they can just keep making small changes to their formulas, and make more processed foods to meet these demands.
A few months ago the EFSA declared aspartame safe, the chemical name for the NutraSweet sweetener. A few minutes searching on Google will show all manner of scientific studies (like a recent one in Italy that proved it can cause cancer) or that it’s approval in the US was seriously procedurally flawed and was never proven safe, or places like New Mexico and Hawaii that have also proposed bans. There are numerous people on the Internet complaining of serious medical problems linked to it’s consumption. The EFSA however could find no evidence that it was unhealthy.
Aspartame is also a product of genetic engineering. It’s not itself genetically engineered, but it’s produced with genetically engineered micro-organisms.
And the reason why sugar, salt and saturated fat are all unhealthy? Yes, anyone?? Any credible scientific studies or even a reasonable explanation? I personally have not seen any.
Now however, our attention is on salt, sugar and saturated fat. One of the recent people to declare these ingredients bad was Oliver de Schutter in a recent report to the UN. Worse than tobacco he says! Until recently, de Schutter was one of the loudest proponents for small farmers, but if he wanted to pick three ingredients to more directly attack small farmers could he have done better?
Saturated Fat: This is in almost all unprocessed animal products. It’s more or less a naturally occurring byproduct of the meat and dairy industry. It’s only by processing the dairy or meat in ways not normally done by small farmers that this is removed. ‘Tropical oils’, like coconut and palm kernel oils are the only other major source of saturated fats, and these are a pretty small part of most people’s diets.
Not only is there not a lot of proof saturated fat is linked to health issues, but you will really only find it in unprocessed meat and dairy products, like would be produced by a small farmer.
Salt: This or sugar are used in almost all traditional processing of food. All pickled or fermented products (like sauerkraut), most cured meats and almost all cheese, require salt in their processing. Other foods, like breads or potatoes, depend on salt for flavor.
Sugar: If anything, modest consumption of sugar may be important for health. For example, it’s known as an appetite suppressant. For traditionally and naturally processed foods like jams or jellies, not using enough sugar can result in a runnier product with a shorter shelf life.
To declare these ingredients bad is to attack small farmers, plain and simple. If you don’t eat salt, sugar and saturated fat, that means eating mass produced industrial foods.
Use your common sense. Is aspartame healthier for you than sugar?! We need to simply reject this sort of argument for our food, and punish any politicians who support it. If overwhelming evidence that the safety of aspartame is uncertain is not enough, then empty claims over sugar, salt and saturated fat are not enough either.
One example of this manipulation at my local supermarket is with potato chips. We are all supposed to think potato chips are bad, because they are salty and well just junk. Right? Actually, they are just fried potatoes. Certainly you can buy better or worse brands, and better or worse potatoes can be used, but the principle is not a bad one. During times when salt is supposed to be bad, my supermarket changes the formula on the house brand and increases the salt to make them almost inedible. In this way, people who eat them in a normal way are supposed to find them too salty and look for something ‘healthier’ to eat.
In hindsight, I remember this going on in the US when I was growing up, and one of the reasons most Americans think of potato chips as a ‘bad’ food.
It’s time to return potato chips to something made by people we trust, that don’t manipulate the salt levels.
No more attacks on small farmers. No more rules for school lunches that force kids to eat processed and mass produced foods. No more reasons that kids (or anyone else) should be encouraged to eat dangerous chemicals like aspartame.
